Thursday, September 6, 2012

It Takes More Faith To Be An Atheist...

"We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes." ~ Gene Roddenberry

Faith is the belief in something without the need for evidence. That is the very essence of the word and the foundation of all theistic religions. Theists will often cite our very existence as all the evidence they need for their specific deity of choice. I literally had a couple of Jehovah's Witnesses point to a tree once and claim that it was "evidence" for their god. True story!

So the argument is: "It takes faith to be an atheist?". Let's break this down shall we?

Apart from claiming evidence through assertions that "my god did it", there is zero evidence for the existence of a specific deity (if you disagree, give me your single best argument for the existence of your god). Therefore, in the absence of evidence supporting the existence of a specific deity we would need to randomly pick one of the many thousands of suggested gods, or none of the above. I've gone for "none of the above" simply because the evidence is not compelling. I was raised in a Catholic household, sent to faith school, attended church, and every single moment of religious "education" sent shivers down my spine. Even then, to my young and forming mind, this was total, complete and utter bollocks. World-wide floods with every animal on a ship, yeah right!

The argument is nothing more than a reverse attempt at Pascal's Wager. Summed up as, if I believe (or pretend to) and I'm right, I'll go to heaven, but if I don't believe (or pretend to) and I'm wrong, then I'm doomed to hell. What's a few Sundays when you have an eternity of punishment ahead of you? The wager has been thoroughly debunked elsewhere (I won't go into it here), but the faith claim above is simply a restatement of Pascal.

What if you have faith in the wrong god? Or the right god, but you're worshiping him in the wring way? As Homer Simpson so aptly put it "What if every time we go to church we're just making god madder and madder?" What then? If there is a god, and he/she/it has the attributes ascribed by believers of the Abrahamic faiths, then hell awaits (okay, technically not for the Jews, but the Christians and Muslims for sure).

Wrapping up on the faith issue, there are many claims made in the world about gods, the supernatural and other pseudo-sciences such as crypto-zoology etc.  Which claims (let's take Bigfoot for example) does take more faith not to believe in? Does it take more faith NOT to believe in Bigfoot than to believe in Bigfoot? The question sound's silly, but those of faith try to make the question plausible when they find/replace "Bigfoot" with "God", and more specifically, "which god?".

And don't get me started on Unicorns....

No comments:

Post a Comment

Obvious troll is obvious and will be sent back under the bridge.